Tyler Zink vs Tung-Lin Wu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 03:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Zink vs T. Wu

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Zink 1 - 0 Wu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler Zink winning 2 and Tung-Lin Wu winning 0. The last match between Tyler Zink and Tung-Lin Wu was at the Little Rock Challenger, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tyler Zink getting the victory 7-6(3) 5-4 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zink | 1 |
| Wu | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Little Rock Challenger(05-28-25)
T. Zink vs T. Wu H2H Profile
T. Zink vs T. Wu Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Wu leading slightly with 45.73% points won, compared to Zink's 43.6%. Could this slight edge translate into a match win?
- In return games, Wu has an advantage, winning 48.54% of opponents' second serve points versus Zink's 44.5%. Does this give Wu a significant edge?
- For first serve returns, Wu marginally leads with a 26.17% success rate, while Zink stands at 25.68%.
- Under pressure, Wu has shown better resilience by saving 55.15% of breakpoints compared to Zink's 52.4%.
- Overall, Zink has been more successful in the past year with a match win rate of 69.62% compared to Wu's 53.7%. Could this indicate Zink's greater consistency?
- Zink excels on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Wu fares slightly better on outdoor hard courts with 57% success. Could the surface play a pivotal role?
- Competing at mainly lower-tier tournaments, Zink has a strong win rate of 77.19%. Meanwhile, Wu has faced higher ranked opponents, which might contribute to their lower win rate. Does this level of competition impact their match readiness?
- When facing tougher competition, Wu's average opponent rank is 262.35, notably higher than Zink's average opponent rank of 403.15. How might opponent quality influence match outcomes?
- If the match enters a deciding set, Zink shows dominance with a 78% win rate, overshadowing Wu's 35%. Could this be a decisive factor?
- Considering breakpoint conversion, Wu is more efficient, securing 35.44% versus Zink's 28.19%. Will this be crucial in crucial game moments?
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
The analysis highlights both players' key areas of strength and weakness. Wu's advantage in return games and their effectiveness at converting breakpoints may prove vital in close games.
However, Zink's more consistent performance over the past year, coupled with their ability to win deciding sets, could tip the balance in their favor, especially if the match extends to a final set.
While Wu's experience against higher-ranked opponents could benefit them, the overall data suggests that Zink's strengths, particularly in critical moments, might secure them the victory. Hence, Zink is the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Tyler Zink vs Tung-Lin Wu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Zink vs T. Wu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 10 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:48:27 | Average Match Time | 1:48:27 |
| 49% (30/61) | 1st Serve % | 58% (49/84) |
| 87% (26/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (27/49) |
| 55% (17/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 44% (37/84) | Return Points Win % | 30% (18/61) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Zink Recent Matches Played
T. Wu Recent Matches Played

T. Zink vs T. Wu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.59% (101/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.00% (270/230) |
| 52.51% (220/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.59% (624/519) |
| 50.98% (2060/1981) | Games Win/Loss | 52.32% (5721/5214) |
| 52.08% (50/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.71% (207/158) |
| 57.41% (31/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.56% (33/31) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.28% (29/38) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 822 | Aces Total | 2028 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 380 | Total Double Faults | 944 |
| 1:34:38 | Average Match Time | 1:35:26 |
| 411.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.11 |
| 59% (6916/11784) | 1st Serve % | 66% (21200/32124) |
| 71% (4876/6916) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (14602/21200) |
| 50% (2434/4868) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5585/10923) |
| 38% (425/1108) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1319/3148) |
| 38% (4363/11469) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12667/32285) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 44.90% (22/27) | Challenger W/L | 51.96% (172/159) |
| 59.09% (78/54) | Futures W/L | 63.03% (75/44) |
| 54% (100/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (265/480) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 48% (26/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (75/172) |
| 62% (31/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (69/154) |
| 87% (102/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (291/238) |
| 13% (102/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (291/49) |
| 14% (83/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (208/32) |